|
By Lin Harris
The Department
of Community Health (the Department) issued a public notice of proposed
changes to the Medicaid nursing home reimbursement system on May
8, 2002. The Department's stated purpose of the change is to more
accurately match payments to the level of services provided. The
effective date of the change is July 1, 2002 although a hold harmless
provision will defer the effect of the proposed changes on nursing
home payments until July 1, 2003.
The proposed
reimbursement methodology is described as the case mix system. Numerous
changes to the current reimbursement methodology will occur with
the implementation of the case mix system. The number of cost categories
or cost centers; the peer groups used for setting reimbursement
standards or limits; and intensity or acuity factors are some of
the changes. This article will focus on issues associated with hospital-based
nursing homes.
Standards
The Georgia Medicaid
program determines standards or limits for reimbursement for nursing
home services. Standards are set for specific cost categories. Nursing
homes are placed in peer groups and standards or limits are based
on peer group percentile values. Reimbursement is based on the lesser
of the specific nursing home's costs or the applicable limit for each
category. Revisions to the standard setting process are a part of
the proposed methodology.
Currently,
nursing home costs are grouped into five categories or cost centers.
The cost centers are (1) Routine, (2) Dietary, (3) Laundry, Housekeeping
and Plant, (4) Administrative and General, and (5) Property. Peer
grouping is based on defined nursing home characteristics. Peer
groups are designated by bed size, level of care and hospital-based
status. Peer groupings differ for each cost center.
Each nursing
home's costs are converted to a cost per patient day. The specific
nursing home's cost per patient day is then arrayed within the applicable
peer group. Percentile values are selected to set limits for Medicaid
reimbursement.
The case mix
system will initially retain the five cost centers. However, a separation
of the routine cost center into two cost centers is planned. Special
care costs such as physical therapy costs will be separated from
the routine costs and distinct limits will be set.
Hospital based
nursing homes under the current system are included in various groups
for rate setting purposes. Hospital based nursing homes were included
in one of two peer groups for routine costs, one group for dietary
costs and three groups for laundry, housekeeping and plant as well
as administrative and general. Peer groups are based on bed size
with the exception of the dietary cost center. The peer group for
dietary includes only hospital-based facilities.
The case mix
system will reduce the number of peer groups for rate setting purposes.
All nursing homes will be included in one peer group for the purposes
of establishing the routine cost limit. The dietary cost center
will continue to include only hospital-based entities. Only one
peer group will be used for the laundry, housekeeping and plant
as well as administrative and general cost centers.
Case Mix Adjustments
The application
of the case mix adjustments will change under the proposed system.
The case mix adjustment will only affect the routine service cost
center.
Under the
current reimbursement system, facilities with skilled Medicaid patient
census exceeding prescribed thresholds receive higher rates through
the application of an intensity allowance. The thresholds are based
on the percentage of Medicaid skilled patients to total Medicaid
patients. The thresholds cover wide ranges of skilled patients and
are applied to all cost centers with the exception of the property
cost center.
Under the proposed case mix system, the case mix adjustment will
only be applied to the routine service cost center and will be based
on the composite case mix for each specific facility (the case mix
index). Each Medicaid patient's diagnosis will affect the facility-specific
case mix index.
In order to
determine the routine service cost component of the Medicaid per
diem, each facility's base year routine service cost will first
be adjusted by the facility specific Medicaid case mix index. The
resulting facility specific routine cost will be compared with the
peer group case mix adjusted routine cost.
The lesser
of the facility specific case mix adjusted routine cost or the peer
group case mix adjusted routine cost will be the basis for reimbursement
(the allowed per diem). The allowed per diem will be adjusted by
the current period facility specific case mix index to determine
the routine service component of the Medicaid rate.
Transitional Issues
Numerous transitional
provisions have been proposed for the case mix system. Routine cost
center transitional add-ons, stop gain/loss adjustments and hold harmless
provisions have been proposed. The public notice issued May 8, 2002
included a hold harmless provision for dates of service from July
1, 2002 through June 30, 2003. The hold harmless provision that ends
June 30, 2003 will delay the reimbursement effect of the case mix
system for one year.
Additional
funding beyond the normal update factors is not anticipated for
the case mix system. Projected increases in rates for certain facilities
will be offset by decreases in other facilities' rates.
Changes in
base year case mix indices and reimbursement year case mix indices
will also impact a facility's rate. A higher case mix index in the
reimbursement year compared to the case mix index in the base year
will result in an increase in a specific facility's rate. Conversely,
a lower case mix index in the reimbursement year compared to the
case mix index in the base year will result in a decrease in a specific
facility's rate. Differences between base year and reimbursement
year case mix indices will likely be reduced as a result of improved
coding, transition to a case mix reimbursed base year and stability
in patient populations. As the two case mix indices converge, the
effect of case mix differences will decline.
During the
transitional period, appropriate coding is important. Appropriate
coding is especially important in response to increases in patient
acuity and any associated cost increases. Incorrect coding will
increase the risk of negative financial results.
Other Proposed Changes
The Department
has proposed changes to the Medicaid nursing home cost report. The
stated purpose of the change is to develop consistency between freestanding
and hospital-based facilities. Hospital-based facilities include
both direct and indirect costs of departments shared with the hospital.
Elimination of differences between hospital-based and freestanding
facilities could lead to the elimination of the hospital-based distinction
in rate setting.
Summary
While the effect
of the case mix system has been delayed until July 1, 2003, facilities
should continue to evaluate the impact of the case mix system. The
Department's case mix model reflects significant shifts in reimbursement
between the current peer groups. Hospital-based nursing home groups
will experience decreases in reimbursement if the Department's projections
are realized.
Procedures should be developed to review coding and to monitor cost
behavior in response to changes in case mix. If changes in the case
mix index do not adequately reimburse facilities for the related
changes in cost, financial results will decline. Proposed changes
in cost reporting and reimbursement methodologies will require continued
evaluation.
About the Author: Lin Harris, a healthcare partner with Draffin
& Tucker, LLP, has been responsible for audits, cost reports
and provider representation before federal and state intermediaries
for nursing homes and hospitals for over twenty years.
|